1. A developer creates a zero-copy clone of a production database: CREATE DATABASE PROD_CLONE CLONE PROD; A week later, a large number of rows are inserted into a table in PROD. Which statement BEST describes the storage impact of this clone one week after its creation?
- A. The clone shares micro-partitions with PROD for data that existed at clone time; the new inserts in PROD create new micro-partitions that belong exclusively to PROD and are not shared with the clone.✓ Correct
- B. The clone immediately duplicates all storage from PROD at the time of creation, so PROD's new inserts have no effect on the clone's storage cost.
- C. The clone and PROD share all micro-partitions permanently, so new inserts to PROD are automatically visible in the clone.
- D. Cloning a database is not supported in Snowflake; only individual tables and schemas can be cloned.
Explanation
Option A is correct. Zero-copy cloning works by sharing the existing micro-partitions between the source and clone — no data is physically copied at clone creation time. When new data is inserted into PROD after the clone is created, those inserts produce new micro-partitions that belong exclusively to PROD. The clone retains a reference to the original shared partitions and its storage cost only grows when data within the clone itself is modified (copy-on-write). Option B is incorrect because zero-copy cloning does NOT duplicate storage at creation time; that is the fundamental value proposition. Option C is incorrect because clones are independent objects — changes made to PROD after cloning are not visible in the clone, and vice versa (with the exception of shared unchanged partitions). Option D is incorrect because Snowflake supports zero-copy cloning at the table, schema, and database levels.