A team wants to validate model performance more robustly than a single train/validation split, especially with limited data. Which technique should they use?
- A. K-fold cross-validation✓ Correct
- B. Training on 100% of the data with no evaluation
- C. Only measuring training accuracy
- D. Deploying without any validation
Explanation
K-fold cross-validation splits data into k folds, training and validating across rotations to get a more reliable performance estimate — valuable with limited data. The other options skip proper evaluation, risking overfitting and unknown real-world performance.